Contemporary Leadership Theory Literature review

Contemporary Leadership Theory - publications review ExampleAccording to the paper findings there is a wide range of leading theories which fox been developed through the years. The theories atomic number 18 classified into seven. The first is the known as the Great humans theories, which ar founded on the idea that leaders are extraordinary individuals whose leadership qualities are inborn. The use of the term Man was intentional since it was generally held throughout the early half of the twentieth century that leadership is a antheral attribute in fact, William James wrote that the course of history is determined by great men, without whom the masses could not progress. The adjoining group is the trait theories, referring to the focus on traits or qualities that a good leader is notion to possess (though which are not necessarily inborn). The study of great men that preceded this yielded very few commonalities among them, bountiful rise to the idea that what defines a le ader would be the set of admirable characteristics he possessed, such as intelligence, self-confidence, determination and integrity . behaviouristic theories are anchored on the actions of leaders rather than their attributes. Behaviour patterns are analyze and categorised to comprise leadership styles. The next school of leadership theories is known as situational leadership. This set of theories views in force(p) leadership not in harm of traits or actions, but the match between these and the situation universe addressed. The situational leadership model holds that the style of leadership should be mathed ot the level of readiness of the followers. ... 66). Behaviourist theories, which came next, are anchored on the actions of leaders rather than their attributes. Behaviour patterns are studied and categorised to comprise leadership styles. Behaviourist theorists conceive of leadership in terms of the roles they fulfil, and the manner in which they are expected to fulfil them (Crainer & Dearlove, 2003, p.1). The next school of leadership theories is known as situational leadership. This set of theories views effective leadership not in terms of traits or actions, but the match between these and the situation being addressed. The situational leadership model holds that the style of leadership should be mathed ot the level of readiness of the followers (Hellreigel & Slocum, 2007, p. 221). The model (also known as contingency model) is comprised of three introductory components a set of possible leadership styles, a taxonomy of alternative situations which leaders are likely to encounter, and a stipulation of which style constitutes appropriate response to which situation. More recently, the transactional theory of leadership has emerged, focusing on assess orientedness and ability to direct groups in a particular way so as to accomplish particularised goals. Compliance is ensured through different approaches, such as offering incentives, threatening sa nctions, appealing to the groups sense of duty or selflessness, or prevailing upon their followers rational judgment, with the leader having little personalized involvement with the group other than driving them to achieve an objective (Martin, et al., 2006, p. 47). Finally, the transformational leadership theory is based on the belief that leadership is not just the sole prerogative of people at the