The Renaissance Art Period - About.com Art History

We all know what the Renaissance was, correct? Michelangelo, Leonardo, Raphael, and company created some fabulous paintings and sculptures that we continue to marvel over many centuries later and so on and so forth. (Hope you are nodding your head right now and thinking Yes, yes - please get on with it!) While these were vitally important artists, and their collective work is what usually comes to mind when one hears the word Renaissance, as so often happens in life things arent quite that simple. The Renaissance (a word which literally means born anew) is a name weve given to a period in Western history during which the arts - so important in Classic cultures - were revived. The arts had quite a difficult time remaining important during the Middle Ages, given all of the territorial struggles that were occurring throughout Europe. People living then had enough to do merely figuring out how to stay in the good graces of whoever was ruling them, while the rulers were preoccupied with maintaining or expanding control. With the large exception of the Roman Catholic Church, no one had much time or thought left over to devote toward the luxury of art. It will come as no surprise, then, to hear that the Renaissance had no clear-cut beginning date, started first in those areas which had the highest relative levels of political stability and spread, not like wildfire, but in a series of different phases which occurred between the years c. 1150 and c. 1600. What were the different phases of the Renaissance? In the interest of time, lets break this topic down into four broad categories. The Pre- (or Proto-) Renaissance began in a northern enclave of present-day Italy sometime around 1150 or so. It didnt, at least initially, represent a wild divergence from any other Medieval art. What made the Proto-Renaissance important was that the area in which it began was stable enough to allow explorations in art to develop. Fifteenth-century Italian Art, often (and not incorrectly) referred to as the Early Renaissance, generally means artistic goings-on in the Republic of Florence between the years 1417 and 1494. (This doesnt mean nothing happened prior to 1417, by the way. The Proto-Renaissance explorations had spread to include artists throughout northern Italy.) Florence was the spot, for a number of factors, that the Renaissance period really caught hold and stuck. Sixteenth-century Italian Art is a category which contains three separate topics. What we now call the High Renaissance was a relatively brief period which lasted from roughly 1495 to 1527. (This is the little window of time referred to when one speaks of Leonardo, Michelangelo, and Raphael.) The Late Renaissance took place between 1527 and 1600 (again, this is a rough time table) and included the artistic school known as Mannerism. Additionally, The Renaissance thrived in Venice, an area so unique (and supremely disinterested with Mannerism) that an artistic school has been named in its honor. Northern European Renaissance The Renaissance in Northern Europe struggled to come into being, mostly due to the stranglehold Gothic art maintained for centuries and the fact that this geographical region was slower to gain political stability than was northern Italy. Nonetheless, the Renaissance did occur here, beginning around the middle of the fourteenth century and lasting until the Baroque movement (c. 1600). Now lets explore these Renaissances to get an idea of which artists did what (and why we still care), as well as learning the new techniques, mediums and terms that came from each. You can follow any of the hyperlinked words (theyre blue and are  underlined) in this article to go to the part of the Renaissance that interests you most.

Essay about Comparison of Michelangelo8217s and...

Comparison of Michelangelo8217s and Bernini8217s Davids â€Å"The greatest artist has no conception which a single block of marble does not potentially contain within its mass, but only a hand obedient to the mind can penetrate to this image.† Michelangelo describes in the above quote what it is like to carve a likeness of a person out of a large block of marble. As we know from seeing his work, he did an excellent job with this task. Bernini did just as fine a job on his, but in a much different way as you will see in the following pages. Michelangelo Michelangelo was born on March 6, 1475, in Caprese, Italy, a tiny village, owned by the nearby city-state of Florence. His father was the mayor. He attended school in Florence,†¦show more content†¦Frederick Hartt does an excellent job of describing the essence of the statue: â€Å"Throughout the statue, but especially in the head, the conflict between line and form†¦ †¦is intensified and deepened. The features are more deeply undercut than in any of the earlier works, possibly because of the height from which the statue was originally intended to be seen. †¦The enormous eyes †¦seem at once liquid and fiery. The flat planes joining at determined angles underlie all the construction of the David, not only in the squared-off masses of the features but throughout the knotty, bony, sinewy, half- developed, and unprecedentedly beautiful torso and legs. For the first time Michelangelo is able to embody in the quality of a single human body all the passionate drama of a man’s inner nature. The sinews of the neck seem to tense and relax, the veins of the neck, hands and wrists to fill, the nostrils to pinch, the belly muscles to contract and the chest to lift with the intake of breath, the nipples to shrink and erect, the whole pr oud being to quiver like a war horse that smells the battle. But the nature of the battle there is no indication whatever; it is eternal and in every man† (Hartt 112). Once the statue was completed, a committee of citizens and artists convened to decide where the statue

Fundamentals of Law for Real and Personal - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theFundamentals of Law for Real and Personal Property. Answer: The Difference Between the Real and Personal Property The property can divide into two parts. Personal property, which is movable. It stated any property that belongs to the ownership that possession can be movable. The property must belong to someone. Whereas, the property is not owned with land which sometimes call the chattels. The personal property law also covers the possession, gifts, lost or abandoned property (Bodie2013). The tangible and intangible property also include in the personal property. Real property defined the permanent properties like land, buildings, crops and mineral rights. It is actually defines such properties which belongs or build in the land. The main differences in real property and personal property are any property can be real whereas personal property not includes in real property. Persona property can be tangible or intangible whereas, real property includes that property which owner owns. The tangible and intangible properties are vehicles, goods, stocks, money and intellectual property whereas; the real property includes land, buildings, crops and mineral rights. Personal property can be easily transferred whereas, for transferring the real property the registration is must through the government acts and rules (Fagundes 2014). The Differences in the Nature and Scope of Claims Supported under the Land Registration System as Opposed to the PPSA The Personal Property Securities Act 2009 is the law about the security interest in the personal property. The personal property can be tangible or intangible whereas, real property includes that property which owner owns. The security interest stated the interest, which is, related to personal property which substances the secure payment or debt or any obligation that related to the transaction. In PPSA the security interest includes those transactions which substance the functions as a security. Under sec- 8 of PPSA provide such interest where the PPSA does not apply. The rights of combination of accounts and the interest is a fixture never includes in the PPSA . the personal security interest personal property, transaction and a legal interest transaction is needed. A personal property can be given as lease if that it is tangible like good which is substance and state the payment or performance of an obligation which is a security interest under PPSA. The consumer properly must be registered by the serial number or the identity of the grantor, which will not appear in the PPSR (Stern2014). Reference Allee, K. D., Lynch, D. P., Petroni, K. R., Schroeder, J. H. (2015). Do Property Taxes Affect Real Operating Decisions and Market Prices for Crude Oil?.Contemporary Accounting Research,32(2), 736-762. Bodie, Z. (2013).Investments. McGraw-Hill. Bridge, M. (2015).Personal property law. OUP Oxford. Eades, R. W. (2016).Torts Involving Personal Property(Vol. 1). Jury Instructions on Damages in Tort Actions. Fagundes, D. (2014). An Information-Cost Critique of Chattel Property Servitudes.Jotwell: J. Things We Like, 191. Stern, P. (2014). Personal Property Security: Conflict of laws under the PPSA.Law Society Journal: the official journal of the Law Society of New South Wales,52(2), 38.

Continuous Disclosure Information Asymmetry -Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Continuous Disclosure Information Asymmetry? Answer: Introducation According to the annual report of Bellamys Australia Limited, the organisation had just $1 million in net cash at 31st December 2016 and the banking facilities (debt) are covering its working capital needs (Investors.bellamysorganic.com.au 2018). Moreover, it has not disclosed the dividend amount and there is potential change in the structure of creditors of the organisation, as Fonterra was granted with additional privileges along with obtaining rights in terminating its contract with Bellamys in the event of a change of control. Moreover, the rising costs of organic ingredients have contributed to declining margins and Bellamys is burdened with above $100 million in inventory. However, one small benefit is that the shelf life associated with the infant formula is 2-3 years and this avoids the needs of writing down and disposal of inventory in the next few months. In the long-run, this could be necessary still; in case, Bellamys is not able to transfer its obsolete inventory. According to the annual report of Bellamys Australia Limited, the organisation has not stated goodwill in its business statements. However, it had some major acquisitions related to segmental assets in 2016. These acquisitions comprise of $719,000 in Australia, $8,000 in East Asia and $25,000 combined in Hong Kong and China. The balance sheet statement of the organisation states that it has $32,295,000 in cash and cash equivalents in 2016 in contrast to $32,035,000 in 2015 (Lattin, Lam and Hunt 2017). Hence, a slight rise in cash position could be viewed in 2016 in contrast to 2015. The income statement of Bellamys Australia Limited depicts the falling profit level for the organisation to $91,521,000 in 2017 from $101,228,000 in 2016. The situation has worsened at the time the organisation has experienced net loss of $809,000 in 2017, while it has made net income of $38,328,000 in 2016. Moreover, the asset impairment loss of Bellamys has been $424,000 in 2017 in contrast to $36,000 in 2016. Furthermore, the organisation has encountered a rise in administration and other expenses from 2016 to 2017. The organisation has been experiencing trading halt of its shares in the form of Certification and Accreditation Administration of the Peoples Republic of China (CNCA). This is because it has suspended the business license of exporting milk formula from the Melbourne plant. This specific aspect has direct impact on the financial position of the organisation because of the halt in trading of shares. Finally, CNCAS has suspended the license of milk export from the Melbou rne plant of the organisation (White 2017). Based on the above discussion, it could be viewed that the financial condition of Bellamys Australia Limited has declined in the year 2017. The suspension of shares and trading halt has exercised main negative effect on the financial condition of the organisation. Due to all such aspects, the organisation has to incur main losses in 2017 (Legg 2017). In this condition, it is suggested to the clients to sell the shares of Bellamys Australia Limited. Abstract: The current report aims to discuss the effectiveness of continuous disclosure regime for the reporting entities in Australia. In accordance with this regime, it has been observed that the business organisations need to inform any ASX listed information to the investors having material effect on their security prices or values. Such disclosure obligation would enable the Australian listed entities to enhance the efficiency and integrity of the share market. The different layers related to regulation, enforcement and guidance intend the conduct of offence in an effective manner. However, compliance could not be ensured with the help of the presence of regulations. Along with this, the introduction of the briefings surveillance initiative of ASIC is taken into account in the form of important evidence, which is planned on the part of the regulator. Hence, it could be inferred that the regime of continuous disclosure in Australia is efficient for the disclosing entities, as the investors would be provided with accurate and timely information. The primary goal behind the restraint on continuous disclosure is to create strong and efficient market of equities in Australia. The reason is that the market would be provided with the entire information while undertaking investment decisions and they deliver the ability of relying on effective provision of information (Lewis 2015). The current investigation related to Newcrest about the violation of the obligations related to continuous disclosure has been a beneficial lesson for the listed firms along with the continuation of the reporting period. The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) have introduced various disclosure practices and a chastened Newcrest making effort in regaining its brand image should have prompted the other public firms to have an effectual view at their own measures of compliance. Hence, the current report intends to provide brief description of the need of continuous reporting regime for disclosure firms and its efficiency. Australian disclosure regime: In 1994, this regime was started and Chapter 6CA (Sections 674 678) Corporations Act and ASX Listing Rules (Chapter 3) are involved mainly in regulating this regime. Section 674 states that the firms need to provide notifications to the investors about the information, which is not available having material impact on the security price or value. In addition, Listing Rule 3.1 states that the organisation needs to disclose market-sensitive information, as soon as it becomes aware and Guidance Note 8 enables in clarifying the above-mentioned application (Chapple and Truong 2015). With the help of continuous disclosure, information asymmetry could be reduced between managers and investors. In addition, it is used to gauge corporate governance reinforced in Principle 5 in ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations. Numerous alternatives are available in ASIC where a firm violates its obligations related to continuous disclosure. These alternatives include enforceable undertakings, proceedings related to criminal penalty and proceedings related to civil penalty with a maximum penalty of $1,000,000 (Ramsay 2015). The infringement notice adherence does not restrict ASIC in adopting proceedings related to civil penalty against those involved with breach and the obligations of the third parties are not influenced. As a result, this conduct (Section 1317HA) has negative impact. Despite rapid handling of such infringement notices, the large firms might view these notices as a cheap and simple way with minimal impact on reputation (Chapple, Prasad and Xiong 2016). Principles of continuous disclosure: There are certain principles of continuous disclosure regime in Australia, which are discussed briefly as follows: The organisations are required to disclose considerable information in order to enable investors to conduct accurate judgements about the security prices, despite the fact that the investors might make separate judgements depending on such information. Moreover, the organisations are not allowed to publish misleading information to the users (Russell 2015). The continuous disclosure regime needs to make an effective balance between encouraging timely revelation of materially price sensitive information and limiting the prior revelation of information. In addition, the firms are limited in forming a speculative environment and price volatility through frequent conflicting declarations about indefinite matters. The continuous disclosure regime needs to make an effective balance between needing the timely disclosure of materially price sensitive information and shielding the commercial advantages of the disclosing entities. However, this application could be conducted only where there is stringent maintenance of confidentiality for these matters (Russell 2015). The materially price sensitive information is required to be kept private withheld from the investors. While a firm might distribute information to the commercial advisers and partners, the individuals should not trade in the shares of the entity. Moreover, in certain situations, there is wide availability of information because of the breach of confidence. The investors need to be provided with such information depending on equality and time (Beekes, Brown and Zhang 2015). The entities are required to obtain clear and consistent guidance in relation to their obligation for revealing materially price sensitive information. Such regime is required to consider a set of penalties and these could be customised to different conditions (Price 2014). Price sensitive information is to be revealed on the part of the organisations to the market, as soon as the same is obtained. Along with this, the organisations are required to disclose information promptly when it is inherent that the disclosure could not be withheld in a legitimate way anymore. Selective disclosure: The ASIC investigation into Newcrest aims to discuss whether the condition of the organisation is revealed to the selected analysts before the market update release declaring significant write-offs and decline in production. Selective disclosure has strong relationship with insider trading (Di Lernia 2014). Moreover, the markets rely on the information stream; however, such reliance need not be at the cost of equity and efficacy. Along with this, it needs to restrain the certain and well-versed investors. Henceforth, selective disclosure restricts the loyalty of the analysts, limits the investors to collect identical admission to information, hampers confidence and minimises transparency. The vicious cycle could be created due to selective disclosure, in which the firms utilise the selected rights of the analysts in the form of a tool for ensuring effective reviews for obtaining an overview that rights could be withdrawn, if the reports do not match with the targets of the firm. In addition to this, the institutional investors might use their power of investment in order to extort preferential information admission from the listed marketing with the help of private briefings (Mayorga and Trotman 2016). However, the abolition of selective briefings would be an effective idea. They perform an important role by filling the gaps, which the analysts might misuse in the normal course of the enquiries. This is relevant, as the investors are the persons seeking advantages from the experience of the analysts. The webcasting and admission to all the relevant documents with the help of the business website, is a technique to level the playing field (Rayson 2016). The listed entities have undertaken this method already in association with the formalised analysts and in some cases, the briefings of the journalists. Even though selective briefings are not an issue and free access to all the briefings of the analysts might help in convincing the retail investors, the objective could be considered unrealistic. Hence, the current initiative of surveillance, which ASIC has undertaken, is a significant enclosure to the continuous disclosure regime. Surveillance: The new ASIC program for conducting spot checks with the selected organisations and reviewing compliance is overdue. The reason is the difficulties related to effective mounting in criminal prosecution along with the implications of ASIC costs of civil and criminal proceedings (Maroney 2015). The laws could be a mixture of persuasion and punishment. The drive of ASIC to the analysts briefings is taken into account in the form of third pillar, which is involvement. Hence, it has become evident increasingly that corporate governance could be reviewed in an effective fashion and it needs to be enhanced as well, if the regulators engaged in its procedures. Conclusion: From the above dissection, it could be cited that the regulations of continuous disclosure in Australia are effective; however, the regulators like ASIC are needed to balance the books by thinking in an innovative fashion. The different layers related to regulation, enforcement and guidance intend the conduct of offence in an effective manner. However, compliance could not be ensured with the help of the presence of regulations. The abolition of selective briefings would be an effective idea. They perform an important role by filling the gaps, which the analysts might misuse in the normal course of the enquiries. This is relevant, as the investors are the persons seeking advantages from the experience of the analysts. Along with this, the introduction of the briefings surveillance initiative of ASIC is taken into account in the form of important evidence, which is planned on the part of the regulator. Hence, it could be inferred that the regime of continuous disclosure in Australia i s efficient for the disclosing entities, as the investors would be provided with accurate and timely information. References: Beekes, W., Brown, P. and Zhang, Q., 2015. Corporate governance and the informativeness of disclosures in Australia: a re?examination.Accounting Finance,55(4), pp.931-963. Chapple, L. and Truong, T.P., 2015. Continuous disclosure compliance: does corporate governance matter?.Accounting Finance,55(4), pp.965-988. Chapple, L.J., Prasad, A. and Xiong, F., 2016. Financial reporting on social media (including Twitter)-reviewing the challenges. Di Lernia, C., 2014. Empirical Research in Continuous Disclosure.Australian Accounting Review,24(4), pp.402-405. Investors.bellamysorganic.com.au. 2018.Investor Centre. [online] Available at: https://investors.bellamysorganic.com.au/Investors/?page=annual-reports [Accessed 16 Jan. 2018]. Lattin, A., Lam, Y. and Hunt, J., 2017. Identifying and managing emerging risks for directors and officers.Governance Directions,69(5), p.302. Legg, M., 2017. Class Actions, Litigation Funding and Access to Justice. Lewis, K., 2015. ASX consults on changes to continuous disclosure guidance note.Governance Directions,67(4), p.201. Maroney, D.B., 2015. Price discovery and the influence of the ASX continuous disclosure regulation. Mayorga, D. and Trotman, K.T., 2016. The effects of a reasonable investor perspective and firm's prior disclosure policy on managers' disclosure judgments.Accounting, Organizations and Society,53, pp.50-62. Price, J., 2014. Continuous disclosure.Governance Directions,66(1), p.6. Ramsay, I., 2015. Enforcement of Continuous Disclosure Laws by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Rayson, J., 2016. Directors banned and fined for breaches of continuous disclosure obligations.Governance Directions,68(10), p.621. Russell, M., 2015. Continuous disclosure and information asymmetry. Accounting Research Journal,28(2), pp.195-224. Russell, M., 2015. New information in continuous disclosure.Pacific Accounting Review,27(2), pp.229-263. White, R., 2017. The Australian brand.Food Australia,69(3), p.34.